ENISA Guidelines

This document provides a comparison of Anonos Pseudonymisation technology to ENISA published Guidance on Pseudonymisation.

Anonos state-of-the-art Pseudonymisation technology accomplishes Functional Separation to enable lawful repurposing of data while preserving 100% accuracy to maximise data utility by expanding opportunities to ethically process, share and combine data in compliance with evolving data privacy regulations.

Read report

The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) has published two reports since the adoption of the new GDPR Article 4(5) definition of Pseudonymisation on best practices for compliant Pseudonymisation - in November 2018 and 2019.

ENISA’s mandate is to enhance existing expertise in member states by supporting the development of cross-border communities committed to improving network and information security throughout the EU.

Pseudonymisation techniques and best practices (Nov 2019)

Recommendations on shaping technology according to GDPR provisions (Nov 2018)

REFERENCES TO ENISA DO NOT INDICATE ANY RELATIONSHIP, SPONSORSHIP, OR ENDORSEMENT BY ENISA. ALL REFERENCES TO ENISA ARE INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE NOMINATIVE FAIR USE UNDER APPLICABLE TRADEMARK LAWS.

New technology controls must protect data when in use.

To learn more about Anonos’ Schrems II solution contact us below.

By clicking submit, you agree to our

*Schrems II refers to the ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-311/18 - Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Ltd and Maximillian Schrems, commonly referred to publicly as “Schrems II.” Use of "Schrems II" in no way indicates any relationship or affiliation with, or endorsement by, Max Schrems or by the Non-Governmental Organisation, None of Your Business (NOYB), or any parties directly or indirectly associated with Max Schrems or NOYB.